Tuesday, November 11, 2025

Barbara Stanwyck ensnares men with her beautiful “Baby Face”

Baby Face (1933) is an American pre-Code drama directed by Alfred E. Green and starring Barbara Stanwyck and George Brent. The supporting cast includes Theresa Harris, Henry Kolker, Margaret Lindsay, Nat Pendleton, and John Wayne in an early screen performance.

The Ascent of Lily Powers

Set during the Prohibition era and the Great Depression, Baby Face introduces the audience to Lily Powers (Stanwyck), a young woman living a difficult life in a dreary industrial town in Pennsylvania. Forced into dire circumstances by her unscrupulous father, Lily is trapped in a life of exploitation and hardship. Her only source of intellectual and emotional guidance comes from an unlikely friend, an older, philosophical cobbler, who encourages her to reject her current predicament and seize control of her own destiny by embracing a ruthlessly self-serving worldview.

An Ambitious Relocation

Motivated by a fierce desire to escape her past, Lily leaves her small town with her loyal friend, Chico (Harris), heading for the promise of a big city—New York. She quickly sets her sights on the Gotham Trust Company, a towering symbol of wealth and power. Armed with her intelligence, ambition, and striking beauty, Lily makes a calculated decision to use her charm and sexuality as her primary tools for advancement.

Climbing the Corporate Ladder

Lily begins her calculated ascent within the bank, moving systematically from department to department. As she progresses, she encounters a succession of influential men, each of whom she manipulates and seduces to secure promotions and financial gain. Her ruthless ambition leaves a trail of ruined careers and personal scandals in her wake, as the men she uses are unable to resist her influence.

The Height of Power and a New Test

Lily’s relentless climb eventually brings her face-to-face with the bank’s President, a man who is both powerful and intrigued by her unique drive. For the first time, her single-minded focus on material success and power is challenged by a more complex emotional dynamic. As financial disaster threatens the bank and her new life, Lily must face a crucial test of her values, forcing her to decide what truly matters to her and if her carefully constructed world is worth the price she has paid.

 

Theresa Harris and Barbara Stanwyck

Click HERE to watch the movie on the Internet Archive.

Click HERE to join the online discussion on Monday, November 17, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. Central Time. Once you RSVP, you will receive an invitation and a link to join the discussion on Zoom.

Baby Face trivia

  • Helped Trigger Strict Censorship: Baby Face is widely considered one of the most notorious films of the Pre-Code Hollywood era and was cited as a major catalyst for the strict enforcement of the Motion Picture Production Code (the Hays Code) in 1934. The film’s frank depiction of a woman using sex to advance her career was deemed scandalous by censors and moral reformers.
  • The Censored Ending and Rediscovery: The version initially released to theaters had a heavily censored ending imposed by the Studio Relations Committee (the enforcement arm of the Code), which showed the main character, Lily, reformed and losing her ill-gotten gains. The original, uncensored ending—which was much less punitive and suggested she was rewarded—was presumed lost for decades until a complete pre-release print was discovered in the Library of Congress in 2004.
  • Early John Wayne Role: Look closely at the cast list! A young John Wayne, years before he became a major star, appears in an early, uncredited role as one of the Gotham Trust Company employees—specifically, one of Lily Powers’ initial romantic conquests within the bank.
  • The Power of Philosophy: In the initial, uncensored cut of the film, Lily’s philosophical cobbler friend quotes German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, encouraging her to reject traditional morality and become a “master” of her own life. Censors forced this Nietzschean dialogue to be rewritten and dubbed over to remove the immoral suggestion and replace it with a more conventional lesson about taking the “right way” to success.

 


Discussion questions

  1. Morality and Agency: Lily Powers is often cited as a classic example of a "fallen woman" in film, yet she is also one of the few women in Pre-Code Hollywood to successfully gain and hold power. Do you view Lily as a victim of her circumstances who is simply fighting back, or as a cold manipulator who willfully exploits others? How does the film challenge or reinforce traditional ideas about female morality and agency?
  2. The Role of Men and Institutions: The film portrays the men in Lily's life—from her father to the bank executives—as easily corrupted by their own desires and entitlement. Does Baby Face suggest that these powerful men and the institution (the Gotham Trust Company) are inherently weak or corrupt, and that Lily is merely taking advantage of a pre-existing moral rot?
  3. The Impact of Censorship (Pre-Code vs. Post-Code): Considering that this film was a major reason the Production Code was strictly enforced, how does the Pre-Code version's ending (if you are familiar with it) fundamentally change the film's message compared to the censored version? Does the original ending support a truly anti-moral message, or is it simply a more realistic portrayal of consequences?
  4. Economic and Social Commentary: The film is set against the backdrop of the Great Depression and touches on themes of wealth inequality and the struggle for survival. To what extent is Lily Powers a product of the economic despair of the time, and how does her ruthless pursuit of money reflect a cynical view of the American Dream during this period?
  5. Lily's Relationship with Chico: Lily's only constant, trusted relationship is with her African-American friend and eventual maid, Chico (Theresa Harris). Given the rigid racial and social hierarchies of the 1930s, how is their relationship portrayed differently from Lily’s relationships with the white men in the film? Does their bond offer a commentary on class, race, or female solidarity in a world of male exploitation?

No comments:

Post a Comment



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...